FreeLesson·Momentum Investing·4 of 5·7 min read·Curated from Richard Driehaus

Relative Strength — Following Where Capital Flows

At any point in time, some stocks are rising much faster than the market. Some are lagging badly. And most are somewhere in between. Relative strength is the discipline of identifying which stocks are leading — and understanding that capital consistently flows toward strength, not weakness.

Why This Matters

Relative strength (RS) measures how a stock's price performance compares to all other stocks over a defined period, typically 52 weeks. A stock with an RS rating of 90 has outperformed 90% of all stocks over that period. A stock with an RS rating of 20 has underperformed 80% of all stocks. The concept is deceptively simple and empirically powerful. O'Neil's research showed that the biggest winning stocks of each market cycle had relative strength ratings above 80 before their major price advances began — meaning they were already outperforming the majority of stocks before they made their biggest moves. Buying strength — not weakness — was the systematic path to identifying what the market was actually rewarding. Driehaus approached relative strength from the practitioner's perspective: capital flows toward strength because strength signals where something good is actually happening. The institutions with the best information — analysts closest to management, early reads on earnings revisions, deep industry knowledge — act first. Their buying creates relative strength. By identifying that strength early and following it, the momentum investor is, in effect, following the best-informed capital in the market.

The Core Idea

Relative strength has several practical dimensions. At the stock level, it identifies individual names outperforming the market — potential leaders worth deeper fundamental investigation. At the sector level, it identifies which areas of the economy are attracting capital — where the macro and earnings environments are most favourable. At the market level, it measures whether the broad indices are outperforming cash — the fundamental signal for whether to be invested at all. Sector relative strength is particularly powerful. When a sector begins to outperform the market — healthcare, technology, energy, financials — it usually reflects a genuine change in the earnings environment for companies in that sector: commodity price movements, regulatory changes, demographic tailwinds, innovation cycles. The investor who reads sector relative strength correctly can position in the best stocks within the strongest sectors before that convergence of fundamental and technical strength becomes obvious to the broader market. Relative strength is not just a ranking — it is a filter. O'Neil's recommendation was to consider only stocks with RS ratings above 80, and to focus on those above 90. The reason is arithmetic: the stocks that will double or triple are almost always among the current leaders. It is very rare for a stock to make a major advance while in the bottom half of relative performance. Confining your search to leaders dramatically improves the base rate for finding eventual winners.

Richard Driehaus's Perspective

Driehaus on the logic of following strength: "Most people say 'buy low, sell high.' But I say the real opportunity comes from buying high and selling higher. A stock that is already the strongest in its sector has already told you something important: capital is moving there. The question is whether the fundamental story justifies following that capital. If it does, you have the combination of fundamental and technical confirmation that defines the best investment opportunities.

Richard Driehaus

A Real Example

Real-World Example

During the 2020 COVID recovery period, the technology and biotech sectors showed exceptional relative strength as early as March-April of that year — before most investors had clarity on economic recovery timelines. Stocks like Moderna, Zoom, and cloud software leaders were outperforming dramatically on a relative strength basis. Investors who followed that relative strength — combining sector RS with individual stock RS — were positioned in the major winners of that cycle well before consensus recognised the opportunity. The relative strength signal was the market's way of processing early, distributed information about which parts of the economy would benefit most from a changed world.

The Common Mistake

The most common mistake is confusing relative strength with absolute performance. A stock can have high relative strength in a bear market while still declining in absolute terms — it is simply falling less than most other stocks. Applying momentum strategies without reference to overall market direction (the M in CAN SLIM) leads to buying "leaders" in declining markets, where even the strongest stocks tend to fall. Relative strength works best in bull markets and sideways markets — it is a tool for identifying winners within a favourable environment, not a substitute for assessing that environment.

Key Takeaways

    What to Read Next

    The final foundational momentum lesson covers Risk Management — the position sizing, stop-loss discipline, and portfolio construction principles that separate systematic momentum investors from speculators, and that make the strategy sustainable across market cycles.

    Continue →

    Risk Management — The Foundation Every Momentum Investor Needs